SCIENCE
How to respond to hate speech without fuelling it further
NatureFriday, October 2, 2026 at 12:00 AM
RedScroll Brief
Nature, Published online: 02 October 2026; doi:10. 1038/d41586-026-03058-3 Psychologist Mirta Galesic discusses an increase in hateful comments online, and the science-backed way to react.
RedScroll Signal
- Impact
- High
- Category
- Science
- Market relevance
- None
- Why it matters
- Scientific signal separates durable discovery from noise — and often foreshadows policy and product. Nature, Published online: 02 October 2026; doi:10. 1038/d41586-026-03058-3 Psychologist Mirta Galesic discusses an increase in hateful comments online, and the science-backed way to react.
Desk copy
RedScroll Briefing
Extractive editorial brief — not a reprint of the original
What happened
Nature, Published online: 02 October 2026; doi:10. 1038/d41586-026-03058-3 Psychologist Mirta Galesic discusses an increase in hateful comments online, and the science-backed way to react.
Why it matters
Scientific signal separates durable discovery from noise — and often foreshadows policy and product.
Background
Nature reported on this under science. RedScroll surfaces the signal with an extractive brief — not a reprint of the original article. Read the source for full reporting.
Timeline
Nature published: How to respond to hate speech without fuelling it further
Story is in today’s RedScroll edition. Follow the original source for updates.
More on
Related stories
- Can we have class outside? Seven tips to breeze through outdoor lectures
NatureSCIENCE
- ‘Learning about physics changed my life’: author Hernan Diaz on his new novel Ply
NatureSCIENCE
- Location, location, location: how to edit genes only in the cells you want
NatureSCIENCE
- Stunning fossil shows dinosaurs’ distinctive path to flight
NatureSCIENCE
- Von Neumann’s party
NatureSCIENCE
- A black hole’s jets have a halo effect
NatureSCIENCE
Source
Nature
Original reporting by Nature. RedScroll provides an extractive briefing only.